The tribunal heard the proposal submitted according to Article 322 (a) and Article 325 (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar at Room No. 1 this morning.-MNA
According to the verdicts, in the proposal No 1/2012, Union level organizations formed under the constitution and the members or personalities of those organizations are members and personalities of Union organizations appointed by the President with the approval of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.
Committees, commissions and groups formed by respective Hluttaws are parliamentary organizations.
The additional definition of committees, commissions and groups formed by respective Hluttaws as Union level organizations violates the provisions of the constitution.
In the proposal No 2/ 2012, the Attorney-General of the Union on behalf of the President asked the tribunal to reconsider its resolution made on 14 December, 2011 which defined that provisions of the Article 5 and Article 17 of the Region or State Personalities’ Allowances, Emolument and Insignia Law are not conformity with the constitution because Region or State national races affairs ministers are officially appointed as Region or State ministers of respective Region or States. The tribunal did not accept the proposal as its resolution is final verdict legally.-MNA